When fresh grants or applications for ABWOR are required for 2011 Act proceedings

This page includes information on when you need to apply for a fresh grant of ABWOR, or if you can continue to provide ABWOR for a hearing under an existing grant.

If ABWOR is approved for a hearing and that hearing is deferred to a subsequent hearing, then the grant of ABWOR will continue to that deferred hearing.

If the hearing grants an:

  • interim Compulsory Supervision Order
  • interim variation to a Compulsory Supervision Order.

then your grant of ABWOR will continue to the next hearing to consider this and at any further deferred hearings, until a decision on a full Compulsory Supervision Order is made, varied or terminated.

If the original hearing required our prior approval to provide ABWOR, you do not need to seek prior approval again for attendance at the deferred hearing.  The grant of ABWOR will last until a substantive/appealable decision has been made in respect of a full (not interim) Compulsory Supervision Order.

You may however need to submit an increase in authorised expenditure application to us to attend any deferred hearing if you have reached your authorised level of expenditure in place.  In such cases, you will not need to:

  • seek ABWOR again
  • answer all the ‘Effective Participation’ questions again where you client is aged 18 or over.

You need to make it clear in your application for an increase that:

  • this is a deferred hearing
  • a substantive decision regarding the full Compulsory Supervision Order has still not been made.

If you are not already providing ABWOR to your client, and it is available to them, you can request an uplift to ABWOR in an increase in authorised expenditure online application.

If another hearing is convened by the Reporter for a different purpose after a substantive decision on a full Compulsory Supervision Order (and not an interim Compulsory Supervision Order or interim variation of a Compulsory Supervision Order) has been made (for example, an annual review hearing is called) then you require to admit your client to a fresh grant of advice and assistance and make a fresh application for ABWOR under that fresh grant of advice and assistance.

S38 Application for a Child Protection Order (CPO) under the 2001 Act

Where the applicant is granted ABWOR for the above court hearing then this grant of ABWOR will continue until the subject child is placed on a Compulsory Supervision Order or the hearing is discharged.

If the CPO is granted, then a fresh application for ABWOR is NOT required for any subsequent:

  • second working day hearing
  • S48 Application to the sheriff for variation or termination of the CPO
  • eighth working day hearing

You can submit increases in authorised expenditure requests for each subsequent hearing and until the subject child is placed on a full Compulsory Supervision Order.

You need to explain in each application for an increase in authorised expenditure:

  • the type of hearing you are then attending e.g. a second working day hearing
  • that a substantive decision regarding the full Compulsory Supervision Order has still not been made

S48 Application for variation or termination of a Child Protection Order (CPO) under the 2011 Act

Where the applicant is granted ABWOR for the above court hearing then this grant of ABWOR will continue until the subject child is placed on a Compulsory Supervision Order or the hearing is discharged.

If the CPO is not terminated at this hearing before the sheriff, then a fresh application for ABWOR is NOT required for any subsequent:

  • second working day hearing
  • eighth working day hearing

You can submit increases in authorised expenditure requests for each subsequent hearing and until the subject child is placed on a full Compulsory Supervision Order.

You need to explain in each application for an increase in authorised expenditure:

  • the type of hearing you are then attending e.g. a second working day hearing
  • that a substantive decision regarding the full Compulsory Supervision Order has still not been made

Second Working Day Hearing under the 2011 Act

Where the applicant is granted ABWOR for a second working day hearing, then this grant of ABWOR will continue until the subject child is placed on a Compulsory Supervision Order or the hearing is discharged.

If the CPO is not terminated at this second working day hearing, then a fresh application for ABWOR is NOT required for the subsequent:

  • eighth working day hearing

You can submit increases in authorised expenditure requests for each subsequent hearing and until the subject child is placed on a full Compulsory Supervision Order.

You need to explain in each application for an increase in authorised expenditure:

  • the type of hearing you are then attending e.g. a deferred ICSO hearing
  • that a substantive decision regarding the full Compulsory Supervision Order has still not been made

 

Deferred Hearings under the 2011 Act

If you are granted ABWOR for the eighth working day hearing or a Statement of Grounds hearing and the hearing grants an interim compulsory supervision order (ICSO) then the hearing will be deferred for no more than twenty-two days.

As no decision on a full CSO has been or can be made until the Statement of Grounds are established and remitted back to a hearing for consideration, any grant of ABWOR made for the eighth working day hearing or Statement of Grounds hearing will remain in place for these deferred ICSO hearings and until a full CSO is put in place for the subject child or the hearing is discharged.

You may need to request increases in authorised expenditure, if you want to continue to represent your client at these deferred hearings and at the remit from court hearing, until such time as a full CSO in put in place.

Any review hearing would require a fresh application for ABWOR. This includes an early review hearing at the request of panel members which is not a deferred hearing.

 

Interim Compulsory Supervision Orders under the 2011 Act

If one of these orders is issued, continued or varied at a children’s hearing then such a decision is appealable to the sheriff court. However, such an Interim Compulsory Supervision Order will be granted because a decision to make, vary or terminate a final/full Compulsory Supervisor Order cannot be made at that stage. A decision regarding a final/full CSO (not an interim one) would then trigger a fresh grant of advice and assistance and ABWOR application, if appropriate, for any review hearing called thereafter.

ABWOR is available to represent your client at a children’s hearing that is considering a continuation or variation of an Interim Compulsory Supervision Order. You have to seek authority from us if you did not have ABWOR at the previous hearing where the Interim Compulsory Supervision Order was made, continued or varied.

Appeal of an ICSO under the 2011 Act

If an Interim Compulsory Supervision Order has been appealed to the sheriff court in terms of s154 of the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 and the sheriff has remitted the matter back to a children’s hearing in term of s156 of the 2011 Act, then a decision on a full CSO has still not been made.

In such a case, if you had ABWOR at the previous hearing:

  • a separate grant of ABWOR is not required to attend this remit hearing
  • you may require to apply for an increase in authorised expenditure if you have reached your current expenditure limit

If you did not have ABWOR at the previous hearing:

  • you can make an application to provide ABWOR at this remit hearing

No ABWOR is available for an extension hearing of an Interim Compulsory Supervision Order before the sheriff. You cannot therefore seek an increase in authorised expenditure to represent your client in the sheriff court for this purpose. Children’s Legal Aid is available for such a court hearing. If you already have children’s legal aid in place for a S101 Statement of Grounds proof, then this grant of legal aid will cover any attendances at any ICSO extension hearings where this is deemed reasonable. See here where the applicant is a child or here where the applicant is a relevant person or deemed relevant person.

S79 Pre-Hearing Panels (PHP’s) under the 2011 Act

ABWOR is available for representation of an applicant at a pre hearing panel where:

  • a determination regarding someone’s relevant person status is to be made
  • someone (a NDPI) is seeking participation rights at a full children’s hearing.

A pre hearing panel (PHP) takes place before a full children’s hearing and accordingly separate grants of advice and assistance and applications for ABWOR are required to be made if you wish to represent your client at both these hearings if they are taking place on separate dates.

The reasons separate applications for ABWOR are required are:

  • a pre hearing panel is distinct from a children’s hearing in terms of the 2011 Act and has different functions
  • if you have been granted ABWOR to represent a non-deemed relevant person seeking relevant person status at a pre-hearing panel and your client is not held to be relevant then they do not have the regulatory right to attend and apply for ABWOR to be represented at the full children’s hearing
  • if you have been granted ABWOR to represent a non-deemed participation individual seeking participation individual status at a pre-hearing panel and your client is not held to be a participation individual then they do not have the regulatory right to attend and apply for ABWOR to be represented at the full children’s hearing
  • if you have been granted ABWOR to represent a relevant person at a pre-hearing panel then the “Effective Participation” test has been satisfied for it but it may be that this test will not be satisfied for the subsequent full children’s hearing. What falls within the definition of a relevant person, or whether or not someone should be awarded participation rights at a full hearing can, in certain circumstances, be seen as legally complex and something which may require representation by a solicitor. However, the effective participation test may not be met for the full hearing, for example, if the relevant person agrees with the social work recommendation and where there does not appear to be any other legally complex matters.

Each application is looked at on its own facts and circumstances. Satisfying the “Effective Participation” Test for the pre-hearing panel does not necessarily mean that the “Effective Participation” test will be met for the children’s hearing itself.

Our prior authority for ABWOR is always needed to attend a pre-hearing panel unless the application is under 18 years of age.

A pre hearing panel cannot take place on the same day as a full children’s hearing, which means that you should have sufficient time to seek ABWOR for both hearings.

If there is no time to fix a pre hearing panel on a separate date and the Reporter therefore arranges for the pre hearing matters to be determined at the beginning of the full hearing then, only one application for ABWOR is required. You should explain this when applying for ABWOR to attend an unspecified children’s hearing and when answering any associated Effective Participation questions in the application where the applicant is 18 years of over.

In this section